Pillar 06

Trust

Why should it be believed?

AI systems analysed
  • ChatGPT
  • Microsoft Copilot
  • Google Gemini
  • Perplexity
+ Emerging AI systems

Why it matters

Why should it be believed?

Accuracy is not the same as credibility. An answer is trustworthy when a traveller can see who stands behind it, when it was last verified, and what happens if it turns out to be wrong.

This is the ground that cannot be scraped. Destination content can be licensed or ingested by anyone. Attribution, currency and recourse are properties of an organisation that accepts accountability, which is why they are the defensible part of the work.

What to identify

Where to look first

  • Which sources carry attribution, and which are anonymous.
  • How recently each material fact was verified, and by whom.
  • What happens when an answer is wrong: who is told, and what changes.
  • Where duty of care obligations make provenance non-negotiable.

Assessment

Four questions worth answering honestly

  • Can a traveller see who stands behind a recommendation?
  • Is there a verified date attached to the facts that change most often?
  • Is there a route for correcting something that turns out to be wrong?
  • Would this stand up if the consequence of a wrong answer were serious?

Maturity

Where organisations usually sit

  1. Anonymous. Nothing carries attribution or a date.
  2. Implicit. Trust rests on brand alone, with nothing to point to.
  3. Attributed. Sources are named, though currency is inconsistent.
  4. Verified. Attribution and review dates are maintained on material facts.
  5. Accountable. Provenance, currency and recourse are published and auditable.

The platform

Govern what AI represents, from one platform.

Overview

12 May – 12 Jun 2026⌄Export →
Governed sources128↑ +12owned, verified, attributed
Verified provenance68%↑ +9 ptsanswers traced to an owned source
Source owners assigned41↑ +6accountable for what AI says
Representation score74↑ +3vs previous cycle
Provenance and ownership over timei
GovernedVerified provenanceOwned answersFindings open
Sources by statusi
  • Verified74
  • Owner assigned41
  • Unverified22
  • Under review12
  • Retired8
Who owns what →
9:41
Destination
SydneyNew South Wales, Australia
OverviewInsightsSourcesEntities
Governed answer
VerifiedOwner: Visitor Services
  • Accuracy81
  • Trust68
  • Provenance55
  • Completeness77
View full insights →
Governance by designBuilt for transparency, accountability and control
Provenance you can trustEvery answer traceable to a verified, owned source
Connected intelligenceMeasured across the assistants travellers actually use

Figures shown are for illustration, not a live account.

Find out where you stand

Most engagements begin with a baseline across all six pillars, and a view of which one is holding the others back.